What is the Real?

Plagued as of late by the fear that I may just be a myth, I've been seeing indicators everywhere that pure perception may not be possible, that everything is phantasmagoria. In this fog of thought which often times resembles a Tarkovsky film, I got an e-mail from a friend with a link to an article by Slavoj Zizek, a philosopher and cultural critic who's book, The Sublime Object of Ideaology, I happen to be reading at the moment. Below is the conlcusion of the article, I think you may, dear reader, see a connection between my intillectual wanderings and Zizek's take on the current state of affairs, or maybe I'm just shining my own shoes. Incidentally, the title of the article is "Through the Glasses Darkly"

"[W]as the financial meltdown really the awakening from a dream? It depends on how the meltdown will be perceived by the general public. In other words, which interpretation will win? Which “story” about it will predominate?

When the normal run of things is traumatically interrupted, the field of “discursive” ideological competition opens up. In Germany in the late ’20s, Adolf Hitler won the competition for the narrative that explained to Germans the reasons for the crisis of the Weimar Republic and the way out of it. (His plot was the Jewish plot.) In France in 1940, Marshall Petain’s narrative, that France lost because of the Jewish influence and democratic degeneration, won in explaining the reasons for the French defeat.

Consequently, the main task of the ruling ideology is to impose a narrative that will not put the blame for the meltdown onto the global capitalist system as such, but on, say, lax legal regulations and the corruption of big financial institutions. Against this tendency, we should insist on the key question: which “flaw” of the system as such opens up the possibility for — and continuous outbreaks of — such crises and collapses?

The first thing to bear in mind is that the origin of the crisis is a “benevolent” one. After the dot-com bubble exploded in the first years of the new millennium, the decision across party lines was to facilitate real estate investments to keep the economy growing and prevent recession. Today’s meltdown is the price paid for the United States avoiding a prolonged recession five years ago.

The danger is that the predominant narrative of the meltdown will be the one that, instead of waking us from a dream, will enable us to continue to dream. And it is here that we should start to worry — not only about the economic consequences of the meltdown, but also about the obvious temptation to reinvigorate the “war on terror” and U.S. interventionism in order to keep the economy running."

If you want to read the whole article, go here.