Tuesday, November 24, 2009
Monday, November 23, 2009
Continuing Protests at UCI

The protests against budgetary cuts at UCI thus far have been poorly attended. However, the first large scale activity is planned for December 4th. Here I reproduce in full, an open letter explaining the reason behind the proposed protest and the planned actions of the occupiers:
Statement on the Occupation of Langson Library
November 23, 2009
STATEMENT ON THE OCCUPATION OF LANGSON LIBRARY
To Librarians and Library Staff
To the UCI community of students, faculty, and workers
To the media
By now you have surely heard about the actions planned for the evening of December 4, which seek to keep the library open overnight. We want to clarify our purposes and respond to possible claims by administrators and your bosses.
As students, we believe we should have full access to books, computers, and library materials before and during Finals Week. We also know that the funds exist within the UC system to maintain a fully-staffed, adequately paid 24 hour library on campus. Close to 8 billion dollars of discretionary funding is sitting untouched, and the UC has taken out over 6 billion dollars in construction bonds. This money comes from our tuition and our and our parents’ taxes, and we want a piece of it. Similarly, we are disgusted by the University’s negotiation process, offering library staff representatives the “choice” of layoffs or pay cuts; we want neither!
In taking over the library and keeping it open overnight Friday and perhaps indefinitely thereafter, we are exerting our agency as students and members of the UC community. We do not expect anything of you beyond your normal work requirements, and despite administrative claims to the contrary, we are not asking you to stay beyond your regular work hours. We only ask of you, and of the University, that we retain access to automated check-out machines, computer labs, and other basic unstaffed resources. We additionally condemn any attempts by the administration to shut off power or Internet access or lock the main doors.
Our only barricades will be our bodies so long as authorities respond peacefully to us, and it is our intent to leave the library cleaner than how we found it. We intend to use the space for teach-ins about the budget crisis, exam review sessions, study groups, and quiet study. On Saturday at 1pm, we will be holding a General Assembly for the UCI community to assess our ability to remain in Langson Library and consider our capacity for further action. Should you or your coworkers voluntarily choose to stay in the library for any period of time in order to assist us in any way, you have our humble appreciation.
This action is being carried out in solidarity with 15 prior occupations in the UC and CSU systems this quarter, and with the occupations throughout the world, most recently in Croatia, Serbia, Germany, Austria, Italy, and Great Britain. While this may be the first attempted occupation at UCI, it will not be the last. We will occupy the entire campus, building by building, until everything that has been taken from us is ours again.
Don’t let your bosses force you to work longer than you want to. Don’t buy into their misrepresentations and distortions of the facts.
LONG LIVE THE OCCUPATIONS!
In solidarity,
Students, faculty, and workers of UCI
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Do Grad Students Dream of Electric Dissertations?
If you want to know more about the book, look here. And if you want to read some microcuentos and other cool stuff by Mike Wilson Reginato, go here. P.S. It's all in Spanish, sorry to the gringos.
Sunday, November 15, 2009
HA! Take THIS Gilles Deleuze!
The body is the Figure, or rather the material of the Figure. Above all the material of the Figure is not to be confused with the material structure in space which is separate from this. The body is a Figure, not structure. Conversely, the Figure being a body, is not a face and does not even have a face. It has a head, because the head is an integral part of the body. It can even be reduced to its head. As a portraitist, Francis Bacon is a painter of heads and not of faces. There is a big difference between the two. For the face is a structured spatial organization which covers the head, while the head is an adjunct of the body, even though it is its top. It is not that it lacks a spirit, but it is a spirit which is body, corporeal and vital breath, an animal spirit; it is the animal spirit of man: a pig-spirit, a buffalo-spirit, a dog-spirit, a bat-spirit... This means that Bacon is pursuing a very special project as a portraitist: unmaking the face, rediscovering or pulling up the head beneath the face.
The deformations which bodies undergo are also the animal features of the head. There is in no way a correspondence between animal forms and forms of the face. In fact, the face has lost its form in the process of being subjected to operations of cleaning and brushing which disorganize it and make a head burgeon in its place. And the marks or features of animality are moreover not animal forms, but rather spirits which haunt the cleaned parts, which draw out the head, individualizing and qualifying the head without a face.1 As procedures used by Bacon, cleaning and features here assume a specific meaning. What happens is that the man's head is replaced by an animal; but this is not the animal as form, it is the animal as outline, for example the trembling outline of a bird which spirals over the cleaned area, while the simulacra of face portraits, beside it, serve only as 'witness' (as in the 1976 triptych).
1.Felix Guattari has analysed these phenomena of facial disorganization: the 'features of faceness' are released and become equally well the features of the head's animality. See Felix Guattari,L'Inconscient machinique (Paris: Editions Recherches, 1979) p. 75.
From Tracy Warr (ed.) The Artist's Body, Translated by Liz Heron, Phaidon Press, London 2000, p. 197. Originally published as "Le corps, la viande et l'espirit, le devenir-animal" in Francis Bacon (Paris; Editions de la difference, 1981) p. 19-22.
Sunday, November 8, 2009
Tron Reboot: Episode 1
Friday, November 6, 2009
"No Quiero, Triste Espíritu" de Luis Cernuda
Comparto con Uds., queridos lectores anónimos, uno de mis poemas preferidos. Para mí el poema revela una arte poética invertida del fantasma. El deseo de no volver, no recordar se opone a la naturaleza del fantasma.
Ahora estoy investigando la noción derridiana de la différance como modelo temprano de hauntology. Tal vez al fin del quarter tendré más que decir con respeto. Sólo sé que Derrida, en su búsqueda de “the otherness of philosophy” se encontró cara a cara con el fantasma.
No quiero, triste espíritu, volver
por los lugares que cruzó mi llanto,
latir secreto entre los cuerpos vivos
como yo también fui.
No quiero recordar
un instante feliz entre tormentos;
goce o pena es igual,
todo es triste al volver.
Aún va conmigo como una luz ajena
aquel destino niño,
aquellos dulces ojos juveniles,
aquella antigua herida.
No, no quisiera volver,
sino morir aún más,
arrancar una sombra,
olvidar un olvido.